Monday, January 31, 2011

Social Scholarship

Drawing from all of the readings for this week's topic, I learned quite a bit. It is easy to believe what Alverman asserts when stating, "adolescent literacy is linked to social practices that involve reading and writing as well as other modes of communication in which young people engage" (8). In other words, adolescent literature is a lot more than it ever used to be. What students are exposed to growing up, and the technology they have access to is vastly different from what I grew up with. As a result, educators may find it difficult to harness these technologies and use them in their classroom and yet if we want our students to succeed, it is imperative to solve this problem. Furthermore, many teachers don't realize the potential for incorporating these technologies, which is unfortunate in that technology is here to stay, and it is only going to become more advanced as time goes on. Part of this resistance stems from the prejudice that students who seem incapable in the classroom are hopeless cases. However, based on the findings in both the articles and the chapters, many students are exhibiting that they care literate in other ways - specifically while using technology. They are "remixing" content they locate on the Internet via blogs, social networking sites, and affinity spaces. The skills needed to do this successfully aren't necessarily ones learned in the classroom, however students are using writing in the "literal sense"as part of the design process for any number of things they create on the Internet.
 Another point made is that the literacies found in school vary greatly from the ones that can be found outside of school. I think of this as "old school"  vs. "new school" however if a teacher can find ways to effectively link the two, students may actually begin to appreciate the "old school" literacies more. As I mentioned before, many teachers do not want to embrace this change in the way a lesson will be run, they do not want to deviate from the standard pencil, paper, and book. To a certain extent, I understand and appreciate this, but the research speaks for itself and if teachers refuse to make positive changes, students will fall further and further behind. The linking of social (new literacy) and scholarship (old literacy) is a perfect example of how this can happen in the classroom. Greenhow outlines a couple of brilliant technologies, such as Diigo and Delicious and explains how they incorporate both literacies. Diigo is very interesting to me because I think that it would be a wonderful service for students to use when writing a research paper. Every high school student needs to know how to write a research paper before they reach college and Diigo makes it a lot easier to find scholarly resources without necessarily using a library. The characteristic that makes Diigo a combination of both literacies, is the potential for collaboration. Students can be linked up with other students from the other side of the country who may also have bookmarked some sources on the same subject. I feel like this is a truly wonderful feature, and one that students would appreciate as well.
Richardson takes the idea of social bookmarking and expands in a bit more in chapter 6 when he says that by using social bookmarking sites to tag content and make annotations, we (the whole world) is slowly working towards fitting the vast content of the web together. In other words, by using sites like Flickr, Diigo, and Weblogs, we are making it easier to locate and find specific content, therfore making Google look just as bad as the commercials for Bing portray it as. Typing any phrase into Google is pretty much hit or miss - either Google understood what you were looking for or it didn't. However, with bookmarking sites, locating the specific information we want can be as easy as hitting the keyboard. I think that this is wicked smart, and can also hold a lot of use in the classroom. Students need to learn how to sift through appropriate information on the web, and this is a good way of showing them how it can be done. Furthermore, as a teacher, the possibility to be able to share content and lesson plans via a site like Diigo, is amazing. Being able to search specific content and link up with other teachers who may have more experience than I do, or may have some great ideas to share, will not only make me a better teacher, but it will also get me online experiencing the kinds of technologies that my students are. Who knows, maybe then we will have something in common.

2 comments:

  1. Kallie, This is a really thoughtful and powerful post. I hope that you gain some exposure to these tools in our class, and it may further the applications you envision in your classroom.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Kallie,

    First I have to say that I loved this post! You bring up some great points about how teachers need to embrace some of the newer techniques of teaching if they want their students to connect to the sometimes outdated ideas that are put to use in classrooms today. I think your idea of merging the two schools of literacy "old" and "new" is a great perspective for teachers to adopt...that a total change in habits is not required but rather some minor tweaks in how they teach and reach their students. You do a great job expressing your ideas in this post and your voice really rings through the words on the page.

    ReplyDelete